We employ a number of models for achieving deliberative democracy,
one of which involves the protocols for deliberative polling.
Developed and tested by Professor James Fishkin at Stanford University's
Center for Deliberative Democracy, a Deliberative Poll gathers a
representative sample of the community to discuss and respond to
questions on pressing local, regional or national issues.
While traditional public opinion polls solicit intuitive responses from people who may not be informed on the topic, a Deliberative Poll represents "what the electorate would think if, hypothetically, it could be immersed in an intensive deliberation process" (James Fishkin, Democracy and Deliberation). A scientific random sample of the population will receive background information on the issues. The sampled individuals then gather in small groups to discuss and deliberate the topic amongst themselves and with experts and then respond to a scientific poll. The result of such a process reflects what the community as a whole would think about a particular issue or policy if that community had time to become informed about the issue. What is emerging from deliberative polling is nothing less than the development of a new democratic decision-making process capable of articulating the informed voice of the people and potentially raising that voice to the level of “consulting power” as a consequence of those deliberations.
In 2004 we joined over a dozen other regions around the country
in two deliberative events sponsored by PBS, in conjunction with
Fishkin's Center for Deliberative Democracy. Working at the time
with WQED Multimedia, Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh and Carnegie
Mellon we hosted discussions on National Security and the Global
Economy. In 2005 we continued to work with Public Broadcasting's
By The People on a national dialogue on Healthcare. Here, for the
first time, we also focused on a specifically regional issue: The
Pennsylvania State Senate's proposed cuts to Medicaid.
In recent years we have also worked at both the campus and neighborhood levels. Through our continued growth and experience, we believe that the Southwestern Pennsylvania Program for Deliberative Democracy can be positioned to take a leadership role in this area and possibly change the way we, as a country, practice our democratic ideals.
The work of the SPPDD is seen as a central part of the mission of Carnegie Mellon’s Center for the Advancement of Applied Ethics and Political Philosophy, which provides office space and resources for the program.
Robert Kubacki, Project Manager
Tim Dawson, Doucment Development
Shilo Raube, Public Relations
Chris Sandvig, Document Developer
Amelia Haviland, RAND Corp.
Catherine DeLoughry, Allegheny
Conference on Community Development
Jim Fishkin, Stanford Center
for Deliberative Democracy
Joseph Kirk, Mon Valley Progress Council
Erika Linke, University Libraries, Carnegie Mellon
Allyson Lowe, Advisory Board Chair, Carlow College
Tracy McCants-Lewis, The Urban League Young Professionals
Evelyn Murrin, League of Women
Kathy Risko, CONNECT
Dan Simpson, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Liz Style, Federal Weed and Seed Program
Karlyn Voss, Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh